They inferred that there was known salvation outside the Church and these cases were exceptions to the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus.

It was Cardinal Francesco Marchetti Selvaggiani and Cardinal Richard Cushing who were not Feeneyites. He held the rigorist interpretation of the dogma extra ecclesiam nulla salus. The ultimate reality, res sacramenti вЂ“ the (ultimate) reality of the sacrament, which is the sacramental grace, i.e., sanctifying grace, as source of further actual graces to live as a child of God, as soldier of Christ, etc. This intermediate reality is both signified and produced by the exterior sign and further signifies and produces the third element. This exterior sign is composed of matter such as water, and form such as the words of the sacrament.ДЄn intermediate reality, called sacramentum et re вЂ“ sacrament and reality, which, in the case of baptism, is the character. The exterior sign, called sacramentum tantum вЂ“ sacrament itself, signifying and producing the other two elements. He distinguishes three elements in each sacrament: In obedience, we must consider the sacramental theology of St. Thomas, especially in metaphysical questions, without grave disadvantage. And let it be clearly understood above all things that when We prescribe scholastic philosophy We understand chiefly that which the Angelic Doctor has bequeathed to us. We will and strictly ordain that scholastic philosophy be made the basis of the sacred sciences. A book like Desire and Deception, authored and published by Feeneyites, is very dangerous for its opposition to St. Thomas AquinasвЂ™s philosophy and theology. Lack of proper Thomistic theology is the root of the error of the Feeneyites THEOLOGIANS IN THE VATICAN-SSPX TALKS WERE USING THE VISIBLE TO US BAPTISM OF DESIRE AND BOTH SIDES DID NOT KNOW IT: NEITHER DOES BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON RECOGNIZE IT NOWДЇeeneyite presense: This site Promotes Feeneyites: a TRUE Schizmatic Worthless for your faith, Worthless for your soul. SSPX should expose the secret of the visible dead theory in the Vatican-SSPX talks THEORETICALLY AND PRACTICALLY WE DONвЂ™T KNOW ANYONE SAVED IN INVINCIBLE IGNORANCEДID POPE BENEDICT SAY THE SYLLABUS OF ERROR IS NO MORE RELEVANT BECAUSE OF THE VISIBLE DEAD THEORY OF VATICAN COUNCIL II? YOUTUBE BISHOP RICHARD WILLIAMSON MAKES A DOCTRINAL ERROR ARCHBISHOP LEFEBVRE COULD HAVE MADE THE SAME ERROR WadeДЄRCHBISHOP MARCEL LEFEBVRE WAS A MODERNIST FOR INTERPRETING VATICAN CONCIL II WITH THE EXPLICIT,VISIBLE TO US BAPTISM OF DESIREД«ISHOP WILLIAMSON ASSUMES THE BAPTISM OF DESIRE IS EXPLICIT FOR US-SO VATICAN COUNCIL II IS MODERNIST. The Consecration of Russia Overturned Roe v.Lefebvre Was Right? The 'Disobedient' Ordination of Alcuin Reid.When Life Gives You Manure, Maybe it's Time for Changes.El PГіrtico de la Gloria and the Music of Pilgrims.Wilton Gregory and the Trad Re-Education Camps.Submission to the Non-Infallible Papal Magisterium is Conditional.Karl Rahner and the Unspoken Framework of (Much of) Modern Theology.

Sspx resistance